Model Controversy

I had a very interesting conversation about models with an investor and a startup CEO today.

​

It was in an interview for a podcast coming out in the fall.

On it, myself and the startup CEO asked the investor this:

"What advice to you have for startup CFOs who are preparing for a fundraise?"

The investor's answer:

  • That they shouldn't cut corners on the Financial Model

  • That anything less than a 3-statement model is insufficient

  • That startups - even at the early stages - should include as much detail as possible in their models.

​

Here's the thing:

I 100% respect this investor's preferences

AND

Both myself and the startup CEO disagreed with the advice.

The startup CEO believes this:

  • That not much time should be wasted on the model at early stage because there are too many unknowns.

While I believe this:

  • That models are essential for startups at every stage, BUT

  • That a 3-statement model is likely overkill until around Series B for most startups,

  • Both because it's unnecessary for most investors (a few cash balance and cash flow lines on your P&L are likely sufficient)

  • And because FOUNDERS should build their own model at early stage, and most founders won't have the skills to build a 3-statement model.

All this to say:

There are a lot of opinions out there about models.

​

But many investors think they're extremely important, even from the very start.

So if you want to get funding,

It really makes sense to build one.

(...Especially if you know a CFO who can teach you how to do so in a 2-hour class plus 4 coaching sessions 🙃).

​

Enjoyed reading this article? Subscribe to receive more via email here. 

Know a Founder or Entrepreneur who'd love this content? Please share it!


Previous
Previous

"Startup"

Next
Next

New investors